Site icon Todd K Marsha

A Theologian at the Service of the Catholic Faith| National Catholic Register

Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna speaking to reporters at the Vatican, Oct. 21, 2019.

<p><&excl;-- BEGIN THEIA POST SLIDER --><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p> <br &sol;>&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<div>&NewLine;<p>For more than 30 years&comma; Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna has been at the center of the Church’s life — far beyond the confines of Austria&period; His retirement this week at age 80 marks the end of a long ecclesial service closely associated with Joseph Ratzinger&sol;Benedict XVI&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>During the pontificate of Pope Francis&comma; Cardinal Schönborn argued for reading Francis in continuity with Benedict&period; His arguments did not persuade those who saw a rupture and earned Cardinal Schönborn critics among his former admirers&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h3>General Editor of the Catechism<&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn is the rare churchman whose name will certainly be remembered decades hence due to his work as the principal drafter&sol;editor of the Catechism of the Catholic Church&comma; the greatest fruit of the long collaboration between Pope St&period; John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger&period; The former put the latter in charge of stewarding the project&comma; and Ratzinger chose his former student&comma; a Dominican priest and theologian&comma; to do the day-to-day work over six years of consultation&comma; drafting and editing the Catechism&comma; the most important post-conciliar Roman initiative&period; Cardinal Schönborn’s work had a massive impact on how the Catholic faith is presented&comma; from elementary school to academic theology&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>He had largely completed that work by age 46&comma; when he was appointed auxiliary bishop of Vienna&comma; former capital of the Habsburg empire and a bridge in Europe between West and East&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h3>Following a Predator<&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn was among the first archbishops confronted with the horror of sexual abuse&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In early 1995&comma; media reports detailed accusations of sexual misconduct against the then-archbishop of Vienna&comma; Cardinal Hans Hermann Groër&comma; made by a former seminarian&period; In those pre-Boston days&comma; the response of both the Vatican and the Austrian bishops was tight-lipped and skeptical of accusations&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Other accusers though came forth&comma; and in April 1995 Bishop Schönborn was appointed coadjutor archbishop to the 75-year-old Cardinal Groër&period; By September&comma; Groër was out and 50-year-old Schönborn was the new archbishop&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>While a soft landing was engineered for Cardinal Groër in 1995&comma; subsequent years would reveal a staggering and stomach-churning record of predatory abuse of seminarians and young monks over decades&period; In 1998&comma; Cardinal Schönborn and the Austrian bishops pleaded with Rome to &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;remove the burden” of the retired Groër from their local Churches&period; The Vatican removed him from all his positions and he lived out his last years in seclusion&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn experienced earlier than most bishops the wound of sexual abuse in his own city and country&period; Cardinal Groër was the most prolific bishop-abuser ever exposed&comma; even by the less transparent standards of the 1990s&period; Christoph Schönborn became archbishop in that context&comma; and the recovery from it would mark the rest of his life&period; On the local level&comma; that recovery would be his most important work&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Given the close relationship between Cardinals Schönborn and Ratzinger&comma; it is likely that the Groër experience shaped the decisions taken by Cardinal Ratzinger in the late 1990s to address more forthrightly the scourge of sexual abuse — against those in Rome who took a different view&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>For both John Paul and Ratzinger&comma; Vienna was a capital of the first importance in Catholic history and European culture&semi; a scandal of that magnitude there surely led to their decisions to strengthen the Church’s prosecution of sexual abuse&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h3>The Scholar Archbishop on Evolution<&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn shared Cardinal Ratzinger’s gift for making scholarship accessible to ordinary audiences&period; He would develop the YouCat youth catechism for young audiences and he carried out an extensive program of lectures around the world&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>When Benedict XVI was elected in April 2005&comma; he included in his inaugural homily the observation that &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;only when we meet the living God in Christ do we know what life is&period; We are not some casual and meaningless product of evolution&period; Each of us is the result of a thought of God&period; Each of us is willed&comma; each of us is loved&comma; each of us is necessary&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>A few months later Cardinal Schönborn took to the pages of <i>The<&sol;i> <i>New York Times<&sol;i> — in a manner that only a few cardinals would have the credibility to do — to argue against &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;neo-Darwinian dogma&period;” <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;We believe that God created the world according to his wisdom&period; It is not the product of any necessity whatever&comma; nor of blind fate or chance&comma;” he wrote&comma; quoting the Catechism<i> <&sol;i>&lpar;295&rpar;&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The Catholic Church&comma; while leaving to science many details about the history of life on earth&comma; proclaims that by the light of reason the human intellect can readily and clearly discern purpose and design in the natural world&comma; including the world of living things&comma;” Cardinal Schönborn argued&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Evolution in the sense of common ancestry might be true&comma; but evolution in the neo-Darwinian sense — an unguided&comma; unplanned process of random variation and natural selection — is not&period; Any system of thought that denies or seeks to explain away the overwhelming evidence for design in biology is ideology&comma; not science&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn set off a global firestorm&comma; accused falsely by many of rejecting science altogether&comma; or even causing Catholic scientists to abandon their faith to preserve professional competence&period; The <i>New York Times<&sol;i> covered the subsequent controversy on its front page&period; A year later&comma; Benedict himself would gather his former students&comma; including Cardinal Schönborn&comma; to discuss the topic at his annual summer seminar&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn’s own credibility&comma; and his proximity to Benedict&comma; permitted him to advance a global discussion on the role of Providence in natural history&period; No one else could have done that&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h3>Arguing for <i>Amoris Laetitia<&sol;i><&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p>That credibility was called upon by Benedict’s successor in 2016 when&comma; with the publication of <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;vatican&period;va&sol;content&sol;dam&sol;francesco&sol;pdf&sol;apost&lowbar;exhortations&sol;documents&sol;papa-francesco&lowbar;esortazione-ap&lowbar;20160319&lowbar;amoris-laetitia&lowbar;en&period;pdf"><i>Amoris Laetitia<&sol;i><&sol;a>&comma; Pope Francis faced criticism that he had contradicted previous Church teaching on Holy Communion for the civilly divorced and remarried&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn presented the argument that the Holy Father had developed&comma; or extended&comma; but not contradicted&comma; previous teaching&period; Pope Francis called Cardinal Schönborn the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;authoritative interpreter” of the document&comma; and <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;catholicculture&period;org&sol;commentary&sol;did-pope-himself-wonder-whether-amoris-laetitia-was-orthodox&sol;">apparently even asked him<&sol;a>&comma; after publication&comma; if it was in fact orthodox&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Many of Cardinal Schönborn’s longtime admirers accused him of changing his views with the changes in papacies&period; Others agreed that he had done so&comma; but <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;angelusnews&period;com&sol;voices&sol;cardinal-schonborn&sol;">welcomed his support<&sol;a> of a novel position&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The more charitable interpretation is that Cardinal Schönborn thought that it was his role as a leading theologian in the College of Cardinals to show how Pope Francis could be read in harmony with Benedict and John Paul&period; That a cardinal would want to present such an argument is a thoroughly Catholic disposition even if&comma; in this case&comma; it was a difficult case to make&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn would&comma; in due course&comma; criticize the Synodal Way of the Church in Germany as risking both heterodoxy and schism&period; His positions were not radical&comma; but measured&period; Nevertheless&comma; he retires with less esteem in some of the circles that previously heaped laudations upon him&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Cardinal Schönborn no longer holds the archbishopric in Vienna&comma; nor can he vote in a papal conclave&period; Yet he is still active&comma; chairing the Council of Cardinals and holding responsibilities at the Vatican bank&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>At the end of this long service&comma; he returned to a <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;catholicnewsagency&period;com&sol;news&sol;259183&sol;cardinal-schonborn-we-must-accept-the-decline-of-europe">Ratzingerian theme<&sol;a>&comma; namely that of the decline of Christian Europe&comma; and the threat that poses to European identity itself&period; At <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;catholicnewsagency&period;com&sol;news&sol;261703&sol;pope-francis-accepts-cardinal-schonborns-retirement-as-vienna-archbishop-names-interim-leader">the recent events<&sol;a> marking the end of his time as archbishop&comma; the voice of Benedict seemed to speak from the grave&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>He confessed to feeling conflicted &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;between the joyful festival of thanksgiving that we are celebrating and the great farewell that so many people in our country are making&comma; mostly in silence&comma; from the Church&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Will the Europe of cathedrals become a large open-air museum for tourists from all over the world&quest;” he added&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>If that is the case&comma; and the renewal of faith follows in an expected way at an unknown time&comma; the work of Cardinal Christoph Schönborn will have planted some seeds that will bear fruit then — the work of theology in service of the faith&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<&sol;p><&sol;div>&NewLine;<p><br &sol;>&NewLine;<br &sol;><a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;ncregister&period;com&sol;commentaries&sol;desouza-cardinal-schoenborn-theologian-at-service-of-faith">Source link <&sol;a><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><&excl;-- END THEIA POST SLIDER --><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version