<p><!-- BEGIN THEIA POST SLIDER --></p>
<p> <br />
</p>
<div style="position:relative">
<p>Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) attempted to lay a trap for one of the witnesses at a hearing earlier this week and nabbed Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) by mistake.</p>
<p>During the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing titled, “Rule by District Judges II: Exploring Legislative Solutions to the Bipartisan Problem of Universal Injunctions,” Klobuchar raised the question of publicly attacking judges on social media because they issue an unfavorable ruling.</p>
<p>Clearly jabbing at Trump and his administration — as well as Republican lawmakers who have moved to impeach the judges issuing blanket nationwide injunctions from their perches in district courts — Klobuchar directed the question to attorney Jesse Panuccio, who previously served as the Acting Associate Attorney General of the United States.</p>
<p><strong>WATCH:</strong></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">ð¥DANG! Senator Amy Klobuchar was NOT expecting that answer! <a href="https://t.co/zlNoHr5BUH">pic.twitter.com/zlNoHr5BUH</a></p>
<p>— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) <a href="https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1908154264020492536?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 4, 2025</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>“Not in a partisan way, just normal, as a partner in a law firm, would you ever — have you ever taken to social media to personally attack a judge who ruled against you? That’s all my question is,” Klobuchar said.</p>
<p>“Senator, thanks for the question,” Panuccio replied. “I think that attacking judges personally, and not their reasoning, well, let me just give you a quote: ‘I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price —&#8217;”</p>
<p>Klobuchar attempted to interrupt and regain control of the situation as soon as she realized where he was going, but Panuccio kept going: “‘— you won’t know what hit you if you go forward with those awful decisions.’ That was something that Senator Schumer said, and I thought it was awful, and it unleashed a wave of violent threats against Supreme Court Justices. I do think that’s problematic, that kind of language.”</p>
<p>“Of course it is,” Klobuchar replied, shrugging off Panuccio’s statement. “I have no doubt the language is a problem on the left or right.”</p>
<p>During that same hearing, Panuccio advised the committee to find a way to stop judges from overreaching, or lawmakers on both sides of the aisle could continue the pattern of judge-shopping in favorable districts to tie the hands of the executive branch.</p>
<p>“I think the incentive for forum shopping is that you think you can get a judge who can be a ruler for the whole nation. So, fix the problem of judges overreaching,” he explained.</p>
<p>Panuccio also raised the topic in mid-March in an X post, saying: “Rule by district judges repeatedly overreaching to impose relief beyond parties to a case is not ‘rule of law.’ Congress should eliminate the nonparty injunction &; make SCOTUS jurisdiction *mandatory* for any injunction certified as an emergency by DOJ.”</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="500" data-dnt="true">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">Rule by district judges repeatedly overreaching to impose relief beyond parties to a case is not “rule of law.” Congress should eliminate the nonparty injunction &; make SCOTUS jurisdiction *mandatory* for any injunction certified as an emergency by DOJ.</p>
<p>— Jesse Panuccio (@JessePanuccioFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/JessePanuccioFL/status/1902402828812927088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2025</a></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/amy-klobuchar-lays-a-trap-for-witness-on-attacking-judges-nabs-chuck-schumer-by-mistake">Source link </a></p>
<p><!-- END THEIA POST SLIDER --></p>

Amy Klobuchar Lays A Trap For Witness On ‘Attacking’ Judges, Nabs Chuck Schumer By Mistake
