Site icon Todd K Marsha

Ben Shapiro Reacts To Trump’s Trifecta Of Wins At SCOTUS

Ben Shapiro Reacts To Trump’s Trifecta Of Wins At SCOTUS

<p><&excl;-- BEGIN THEIA POST SLIDER --><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p> <br &sol;>&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<div style&equals;"position&colon;relative">&NewLine;<p>Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro reacted to three massive Supreme Court rulings that came down in favor of conservatives on Friday&comma; one on birthright citizenship&comma; one on LGBT children’s books&comma; and the third on a Texas pornography law&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The three biggest decisions all came down in favor of President Trump&comma;” Shapiro said in his video reaction to the news on Friday&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><amp-youtube layout&equals;"responsive" width&equals;"1170" height&equals;"658" data-videoid&equals;"eXGQhV6jA-Q" title&equals;"BREAKING&colon; 3 HUGE WINS From the Supreme Court"><a placeholder href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;youtube&period;com&sol;watch&quest;v&equals;eXGQhV6jA-Q"><img src&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;i&period;ytimg&period;com&sol;vi&sol;eXGQhV6jA-Q&sol;hqdefault&period;jpg" layout&equals;"fill" object-fit&equals;"cover" alt&equals;"BREAKING&colon; 3 HUGE WINS From the Supreme Court"><&sol;a><&sol;amp-youtube><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In the first case&comma; the Supreme Court <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;dailywire&period;com&sol;news&sol;supreme-court-sides-with-trump-limits-nationwide-injunctions-in-birthright-citizenship-fight&quest;author&equals;Mairead&plus;Elordi&amp&semi;category&equals;News&amp&semi;elementPosition&equals;2&amp&semi;row&equals;0&amp&semi;rowType&equals;Vertical&plus;List&amp&semi;title&equals;Supreme&plus;Court&plus;Sides&plus;With&plus;Trump&percnt;2C&plus;Limits&plus;Nationwide&plus;Injunctions&plus;In&plus;Birthright&plus;Citizenship&plus;Fight" target&equals;"&lowbar;blank" rel&equals;"noopener">cracked down<&sol;a> on lower courts trying to hamstring President Trump’s agenda&comma; ruling that Trump may end birthright citizenship in some parts of the country while legal challenges against his order proceed in others&period; Previously&comma; courts in Maryland&comma; Massachusetts&comma; and Washington state had issued nationwide injunctions that blocked Trump’s order from taking effect across the country&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The ruling did not address the question of birthright citizenship itself&comma; which is the practice of granting automatic citizenship rights for babies born on United States soil&comma; regardless of their parents’ citizenship status&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Nationwide injunctions by courts blocking Trump’s agenda have been a &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;massive problem” for his administration since he took office&comma; Shapiro said in his response&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The basic issue here is that there is nothing in the history of the U&period;S&period; judicial system that suggests universal injunctions from district courts are a thing&comma;” the host of &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The Ben Shapiro Show” said&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;You can’t just randomly make up universal injunctions and then start applying them without any sort of limitation&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><strong><a class&equals;"c-link" href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;get&period;dailywire&period;com&sol;freedom&sol;&quest;utm&lowbar;medium&equals;website&amp&semi;utm&lowbar;source&equals;editorial&amp&semi;utm&lowbar;campaign&equals;freedom&amp&semi;utm&lowbar;content&equals;freedomeditorial" target&equals;"&lowbar;blank" rel&equals;"noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;get&period;dailywire&period;com&sol;freedom&sol;&quest;utm&lowbar;medium&equals;website&amp&semi;utm&lowbar;source&equals;editorial&amp&semi;utm&lowbar;campaign&equals;freedom&amp&semi;utm&lowbar;content&equals;freedomeditorial" data-sk&equals;"tooltip&lowbar;parent" aria-describedby&equals;"sk-tooltip-2388">JULY 4 SALE&colon; Get Six Months Of DW&plus; Free<&sol;a><&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Justice Amy Coney Barrett&comma; who penned the court’s majority opinion&comma; blistered Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The court goes out of its way to smack down Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent&comma; which is truly a crazy dissent&comma;” Shapiro noted&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;I mean&comma; her dissent in this case essentially says that because she feels like it&comma; any district court judge should be able to issue any nationwide injunction against the Executive branch&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;As the court points out&comma; that’s kind of crazy&comma;” Shapiro said&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;For the Left&comma; the answer always and forever is more power to whatever branch is useful to them&period; There is no actual through-line to their jurisprudence&period; This has always been the problem with constitutional jurisprudence from the Left&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The second decision the Supreme Court handed down on Friday was in favor of a group of religious parents who sued over their Maryland school district barring them from opting their children out of LGBT books in the classroom&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Justice Samuel Alito <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;dailywire&period;com&sol;news&sol;supreme-court-sides-with-parents-says-schools-cant-mandate-lgbt-curricula&quest;author&equals;Mairead&plus;Elordi&amp&semi;category&equals;News&amp&semi;elementPosition&equals;1&amp&semi;row&equals;0&amp&semi;rowType&equals;Vertical&plus;List&amp&semi;title&equals;Supreme&plus;Court&plus;Sides&plus;With&plus;Parents&percnt;2C&plus;Says&plus;Schools&plus;Can’t&plus;Mandate&plus;LGBT&plus;Curricula" target&equals;"&lowbar;blank" rel&equals;"noopener">penned<&sol;a> the court’s majority opinion&comma; writing that the school district burdened the parents’ First Amendment rights&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p data-uri&equals;"cms&period;cnn&period;com&sol;&lowbar;components&sol;paragraph&sol;instances&sol;cmcewerp1000r3b6oril8fy6e&commat;published" data-editable&equals;"text" data-component-name&equals;"paragraph" data-article-gutter&equals;"true">The Maryland parents who sued included Catholics&comma; Muslims&comma; and Ukrainian Orthodox&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p data-uri&equals;"cms&period;cnn&period;com&sol;&lowbar;components&sol;paragraph&sol;instances&sol;cmcewerp1000r3b6oril8fy6e&commat;published" data-editable&equals;"text" data-component-name&equals;"paragraph" data-article-gutter&equals;"true">The controversial LGBT books included &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Prince and Knight” about a prince who falls in love with a knight instead of a princess&comma; and &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Uncle Bobby’s Wedding” about a girl’s uncle who marries another man&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;So basically they were just going to force kids to listen to LGBTQ plus&comma; minus&comma; divided-by sign agitprop without notifying parents or allowing them the possibility of opt out&comma;” Shapiro said&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Shapiro remembered how his own parents were able to opt him out of sex education in middle school&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;That’s an extraordinary thing&comma;” he said&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;I remember&comma; when I went to public middle school&comma; we reached the age where &lbrack;Los Angeles Unified School District&rsqb; decided that it was necessary that you be taught sex ed&comma; and my parents&comma; who had already taught me about sex&comma; did not wish to have a bunch of left-wing agitprop shoveled into my brain by a bunch of public school educators&comma; and so they opted me out&period; And they were allowed to opt me out because religious freedom and all that&period; Well&comma; this particular school district said no&comma; you cannot opt out no matter what you do&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Justice Alito goes into excruciating detail&comma; pointing out what exactly happens in these books that are being taught to extremely small children&comma; about sexual fluidity&comma; gender identity&comma; same-sex marriage&comma; and all the rest&comma;” Shapiro noted&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;It is very&comma; very obvious&comma; very clear&comma; of course&comma; that the goal here is not just to teach what the law is nationally in the United States that men can marry men and women can marry women&period; The idea here is that it’s supposed to be upheld as a moral good&comma; and you can’t opt out&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;If you are teaching third graders that it is a positive good&comma; an excellent positive good for boys to marry boys and girls to marry girls&comma; boys to be girls&comma; girls to be boys&comma; and all the rest&comma; that of course is what Justice Alito calls a chilling vision of the power of the state to strip away the critical rights of parents to guide religious development of their children&comma;” Shapiro said&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In Friday’s last major decision&comma; the Supreme Court <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;dailywire&period;com&sol;news&sol;supreme-court-upholds-texas-law-requiring-age-verification-to-shield-kids-from-pornography&quest;author&equals;Spencer&plus;Lindquist&amp&semi;category&equals;News&amp&semi;elementPosition&equals;1&amp&semi;row&equals;0&amp&semi;rowType&equals;Vertical&plus;List&amp&semi;title&equals;Supreme&plus;Court&plus;Upholds&plus;Texas&plus;Law&plus;Requiring&plus;Age&plus;Verification&plus;To&plus;Shield&plus;Kids&plus;From&plus;Pornography" target&equals;"&lowbar;blank" rel&equals;"noopener">voted<&sol;a> to uphold a Texas law requiring users to verify their age before viewing pornography&comma; ruling against a trade organization for the porn industry&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;It is not some gigantic burden for somebody who is above the age of 18 to type in their age&period; That’s the basic finding&comma;” Shapiro said&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The fact that&comma; again&comma; the three liberals on the court found this to be some sort of violation of core First Amendment liberty is insane&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Shapiro added that he would have &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;gone further&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Pornography should not be covered by the First Amendment&comma;” Shapiro said&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;The notion that the Founding Fathers were sitting around talking about the necessity of accessing pornography when they wrote the First Amendment is insane&period; In fact&comma; there were pornography laws on the books of I believe every state at the time of the founding&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Shapiro emphasized that all three decisions tie back to Trump’s 2016 election&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;If he had not won the 2016 election&comma; you would have had a left-wing bench cramming down the worst form of left-wing radicalism imaginable via the Supreme Court&comma;” Shapiro said&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<&sol;div>&NewLine;<p><br &sol;>&NewLine;<br &sol;><a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;dailywire&period;com&sol;news&sol;birthright-citizenship-lgbt-books-porn-law-ben-shapiro-reacts-to-trumps-trifecta-of-wins-at-scotus">Source link <&sol;a><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p><&excl;-- END THEIA POST SLIDER --><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version